In his 2017 book, Paradoks Indonesia (Indonesian Paradox), he argued that despite being a resource-abundant country, Indonesia has experienced an “outflow of national natural resources” because of mismanagement, wrong economic direction and defective elites.
He claims Indonesia’s current economic system is based on “the economics of stupidity” because of the privatization of lands by foreign investors and the country’s dependence on loans. Prabowo is using exactly the same nationalist playbook as he did in 2014. What has changed this time around? When it comes to Prabowo, the answer is - not much. Back then Prabowo Subianto set the nationalist tone and Joko “Jokowi” Widodo was often viewed as the more liberal, technocratic type on economic questions. Much like in 2014, each camp claims strong nationalist credentials when it comes to the economy. Indonesia’s presidential candidates have been stepping up their campaigns. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesĭitulis Oleh : Aninda Dewayanti (Penerima Bakrie Graduate Fellowship Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nanyang Technological University 2017).Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Bi-Weekly, Montly & Quarterly e-Newsletter.Public Discussion Forum & Videoconference.BGF (Bakrie Graduate Fellowship) Overseas.
0 kommentar(er)
